epson perfection v500 photo scanner for paper and film

Admittedly, people have had uneven experiences with this software (fair to say, most have had good experiences). If you have a little time, perhaps you could download a free trial copy of VueScan.

However, people who have the time and patience to investigate those sorts of matters usually report that the latitude in the height of transparencies from the bed is much more than expected. As someone has already said, the precise height of the negatives may be in play. If it's possible for you to borrow someone else's flatbed, either Epson or a recent Canon, I would be interested in the results.Ģ. (Again, I'd like to see the print placed on the scanner.)ġ. I think you should be getting better results from your scanner. The first, a very nice UMAX scanner that was done in with SCSSI going out the window and my current scanner, an old Epson 3170. I've used a number of very fine scanners, and have owned two low end flat beds. I'd be interested in knowing what happens when you place the print directly on the scanner, and scan the print rather than the negative taken from a photo of the print. Or, there may be variables in play with transparency placement.

There may be something actually wrong with the scanner. I think you should be getting better results from the scanner.

Not meant to insult, but it's important to ask!Īnd you are running fully in the 'pro' mode, right? (Yes, I know, the 'pro' mode isn't so pro.)Īnd the reminder once again, the Epson software can sometimes mysteriously change its settings without the operator knowing. You aren't running the software with one of its descreening options turned on, are you? First, the most obvious question: Epson software sometimes doesn't 'retain' its settings.

Epson perfection v500 photo scanner for paper and film